Jinan jinyingtai chemical co., ltd.-there is no feasible substitute for the toxic hazards of high-efficiency flame retardants.
Release time:
2022-07-11
Flame retardant burning science and technology is developed to meet the needs of social safety in production and life, to prevent fires and to protect people's lives and property. However, many flame retardants are toxic to health, lecabdea are highly efficient flame retardants. Recent animal scientific research shows that the substance may cause adverse knowledge to health, such as brain nervous system toxicity and liver problems.
Huicong Plastics Network News: Flame retardant burning science and technology is developed to meet the needs of social safety in production and life, to prevent fires and to protect people's lives and property. However, many flame retardants are toxic to health and lecabdea are highly efficient flame retardants. Recent animal scientific research shows that this substance may cause adverse health risks, such as brain nervous system toxicity and can cause liver problems.
The European Chemicals Agency (CH) has announced that it will accept comments on a "restriction proposal" for decabromodiphenyl ether (ECABIE) by December 15, 2013. The goal of the review is to collect information and evidence on the feasibility of lecane replacement. lecane is mainly used in plastics, polymer materials, composites, francium fabrics and other substances.
DECABDE is a highly effective flame retardant used to prevent items from being ignited. It is estimated that the substance can reduce the fire fatality rate by 20%. Initially, the substance was used mainly in plastics and textiles. In plastics, ENABLE is mainly used in electrical and electronic equipment, transportation and aviation industry, as well as building materials. On July 1, 2008, the European Court of Justice ruled that DECABDE in Europe. It shall not be used for electrical and electronic products. Relevant parties may submit comments through the online questionnaire by December 15, 2013 at the latest. The restriction proposal is expected to be submitted on August 1, 2014.
For a long time, the use of DECABDEL has not caused health and environmental concerns. Despite 10 years of scientific research, the 2004 environmental and human health risk assessment concluded that there is no significant risk in the relevant application areas of ecard. However, there are scientific studies that show that LECABDE can harm the environment. DECABDEP can enter the environment through different channels, such as emissions through the production of products containing eaBE and emissions through the products themselves.
UK Environment Department (DEFRA) Wa-European Environment Station Zou Fuichi Report, known as LECABIE Endurance, Biological Cumulative Toxic (PFT) in December 2012, ECABDE entered RACH weather in blue.
ECHA recommends that LECABDE be included in the Union's green list of authorized substances (R with ACH method and Appendix IV). In the process of stopping the proposal, Norway had suggested that ECABDE be included in the Stockholm Agreement on Organic Pollutants. The European Commission decided to bring the disposal of ECABDEE in EU law into line with the requirements of the agreement. Because of this, the European Commission requested ECHA not to include ECABDE' in the RAC Appendix XIV green list, but to prepare an R with ACH Appendix XV "Restriction Proposal".
The objective of the proposal is to restrict the manufacture, use and sale of ECABDE? and products containing it. ECH says about ECABDE! Information on the feasibility of restrictions was not sufficient; it would be useful to know the challenges that the industry might face if the use of ecall with alternative substances was mandated and how long it would take to address that challenge.
Latest information